Pann: What's interesting about BTS is that they don't have a leftover member
1. [+321, -13] Rather than every member shining, I can't think of an outstanding member. BTS feels like BTS itself.
2. [+294, -14] BTS has a good team balance. The 7 members know that their fellow members have to do well for themselves to do well. They have a member good at performance, a member good at music, and their roles as vocalists and rappers are clear. None of them falls behind.
3. [+279, -15] It's good that they don't have a top member. Every member is good at something so they don't have a leftover member.
4. [+103, -3] Americans also find it interesting. In the US, a boy band always has one outstanding member and the other members seem like the background. They find it interesting that all members in BTS are equally liked.
5. [+94, -4] There's no such thing as a bias... My bias changes every time.
6. [+94, -3] Even for the CFs, they only do them as a group.
7. [+91, -152] What? I can definitely think of one member when it comes to a leftover ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
8. [+87, -5] RM said something like "BTS did well because we don't have a top member and we're glad." If there's a top member, the rest of the members will leave when the contract expires. Look at Block B and EXID for example.
9. [+73, -1] They take turns to be in the spotlight. Whenever my bias changes, I wonder, "Wow... what would've happened if this member wasn't in BTS?"
10. [+59, -45] The popularity of each member is so different... Look at the number of votes...
11. [+55, -2] A group can't do well if they push only one member.
12. [+50, -8] During BTS's debut days of I Need U, they were called KookV Boys' Scout because the visuals Jungkook and V were the most popular ones. But as people watched videos of BTS hanging out, they found other members' charms and it increased their popularity.
