- Idol group member B, who is insecure about his age, looks, talent, and everything about himself, kept relying on drugs and got ruined. When B was a trainee, he was the #1 person to be avoided by other trainees because B kept picking up fights with other trainees for the sake of acting upset. If a staff or the CEO would eye on a trainee, B would bully the trainee and say things like, "What are you staring at?" "Are you looking down on me because I'm a lot older?" After debut, B still struggled with his unstable mental state. He's been getting ADHD treatment and even taking drugs. In other words, he's living with an unhealthy mental state. How unfortunate of him.
- Top actress G, who is having a long-waited comeback in a project, is showing her supercilious aura. She still never bothers to read the script before coming to the filming set. On the spot, she would skim through the script and change her lines with nonsenses. Like that, she's acting like a nuisance in every way. G also smokes a lot but she doesn't even smoke with her own hands. G would make a V sign and her manage would appear. He would stick a cigarette in her mouth and lit the cigarette for her. The staff who saw the scene say, "She's much worse than how she's rumored" and roll their eyes.
=
Article: Male idol B, who kept relying on drugs and got ruined
Source: Newsen via Nate
1. [+707, -7] I think it's really trashy how articles are written with only initials without revealing the names. Even if the story is completely fabricated, no one would know the truth and people would get baited by the article title.
2. [+573, -6] If you can't reveal the name, why don't you just keep the story to yourself... I can't with "A did this, A did that..."
3. [+518, -4] Is this really an article?
4. [+61, -1] I could write one, too. "Popular idol D was actually an alien. She went back to the space." How is this article any different?
5. [+39, -1] The ending reminds me of a folk tale ã…‹ã…‹ I wish the ending was "And they lived happily as ever", what a pity ã…‹ã…‹
6. [+33, -0] What you guys don't get is that this type of article isn't written for us non-celebrities to read. It's a message directed towards entertainment agencies saying "We have this information and we can reveal it anytime, so you better contact us to negotiate~" However, the vagueness of this article shows that the journalist isn't too sure about the truth of the info. If the agency contacts the journalist, they'll be admitting that this is true. If the agency doesn't, the journalist can reveal the info any time. So the agency is going to start investigating how this info got leaked. If the journalist catches the agency's investigation, it also confirms that this info is true.
-
Article: Supercilious top actress, did she mistake the filming set for a host bar?
Source: Newsen via Naver
1. [+20, -3] I can tell who this is right away, tsk.
2. [+13, -1] I hope it's not the actress who's on My Lawyer, Mr. Jo? I really hope not because she doesn't seem anything special.
3. [+10, -0] Go go~ Go~
Comments
Post a Comment