2026 World Cup to have a joint venue of USA, Canada, & Mexico

Article: FIFA reveals 2026 World Cup venues... 'union of USA-Canada-Mexico'

Source: Sportal Korea via Naver

1. [+3497, -56] If they're having a joint venue on a huge continent like that, the traveling distance will be really long...

2. [+2335, -54] The time zone though... I'll have to watch it at dawn or in the morning.

3. [+1852, -64] Our country will set a legendary record if we participate in 2022 World Cup since any country get into the limit of 48 countries.

4. [+1278, -41] Shouldn't they be considerate of the players' traveling distance? It'll be very hard for them.

5. [+1226, -27] Then what about the automatic advancement of the venue countries?

6. [+76, -2] Canada advances in World Cup ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

7. [+33, -0] 48 countries, 80 matches, joint venue of 3 countries...

8. [+24, -0] I thought they weren't going to have a joint venue anymore. It's not like those are small countries, either. Traveling will take forever.
-

Source: Nate

1. [+115, -10] Why should the players be traveling between Canada and Mexico during the World Cup? It's not like the two countries are next door. It'll take minimum of 6 hours by plane.

2. [+109, -7] I feel like they're overdoing it.

3. [+17, -0] Soccer is one of the most unpopular sports in Canada ㅋㅋㅋ It's equivalent to the popularity of canoe race in Korea ㅋㅋㅋㅋ This is unexpected.

4. [+12, -1] Joint venue of 3 countries is the worst decision they've made.

5. [+11, -0] 2030 World Cup should have a joint venue of Philippines, Indonesia, India, Nepal, Timor-Leste, Thailand, Myanmar, and Singapore.